Among those many smartphones launched during the MWC event in the last couple of days, Samsung Galaxy S II and LG Optimus 3D are probably few of them that really attract people attention. The Samsung Galaxy S II uses the Samsung’s own dual-core processor Exynos 4210 and Super AMOLED Plus display. While the LG Optimus 3D is world’s first smartphone to use dual-core, dual-channel and dual-memory architecture with the Texas Instruments OMAP4 4430 processor. But when it comes to performance which one do you think performs better?
A benchmark testing performed by folks at Anandtech recently shows that the Optimus 3D’s TI OMAP 4 performed better than the Samsung’s Exynos 4210. Moreover, the OMAP 4 even has a better performance compared to the famous NVIDIA Tegra 2.
[via: Anandtech]
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
[...] to the article i posted before, a benchmark test shows that the TI OMAP4 with dual-core dual-channel used by LG Optimus 3D [...]
[...] and dual-memory” which is claimed to perform better than the common configuration. An LG Optimus 3D bencmarks couple of months ago shown that the OMAP 4 performed better than Exynos and Tegra [...]